Not Irresponsible?

With each new post on county commission candidate, Marty Fugate's campaign Facebook page, we get a little more insight into his opinions on mass over development.

In the string below, Mr. Fugate is pressed on his views on development. He was asked if he felt Lenoir City officials have been irresponsible with their development practices. According to Fugate, they have not. What?

Martin Whorley

Based on your comments below, I see one relevant question that county residents will have. Do you consider what the city mayor and council are doing as irresponsible growth?

Being part of Aikens host committee for his re-election campaign would lead voters to assumptions about your values. It would be good to have a clear, defined answer on your view of the current growth situation affecting the county given you are running a campaign to change “how things are”.

Vote Marty Fugate
 

Martin Whorley thanks for your question, and also, thank you for not developing any preconceived notions about my character or my values based on serving on a host committee for Mayor Aikens.

One thing I do is I think for myself. I don’t need someone to hide behind someone else’s name and feed “tough” questions to someone. Mayor Aikens is a man that must answer for and speak for himself. Same with me, I answer for and speak for myself.

I noticed on your page that you’re a believer, as am I. One thing I’ve allowed my faith to help me with in my business is not judging others based on what someone else says about them.

I have a lot of friends in this community, but my friends don’t always like my other friends, and that’s ok, we’re all allowed to think how we wish.

Mayor Aikens is a friend of mine and yes, I was a co-host of his fundraiser but that doesn’t mean that he and I agree on every single issue, nor does it mean that he will be some type of puppet master to me. Anyone that knows me would laugh at the thought of someone “controlling me”.

To your question, I would appreciate it if you could be a little more direct. The “growth situation” can be related to a host of responses. Are you wanting me to address congestion on roads, schools, first responders, etc? I’m happy to do so and have in many other replies on this post.

To summarize, growth isn’t bad if it’s managed and done through a lens of responsibility that allows for infrastructure to grow with our population, not play catch up, like many communities do.

Infrastructure isn’t just roads. As our population grows, our schools have to grow, our first responders and law enforcement must grow with their budget and with staffing. This can be tied to tax revenue, not a tax increase. We can’t have sprawl or unrestricted growth, I’m 100% opposed to that.

Martin Whorley

Vote Marty Fugate I thought my question was clear enough, but maybe not. County residents’ main concern is the explosive housing development. Everything else you listed is fallout from that.

I’ll try to be more direct. Given the thousands of new homes already on their way, was the city mayor and council responsible or irresponsible in their actions? We would like all candidates to be able to provide a simple yes or no answer to a question like this.

Many voters already see infrastructure as already behind the curve on this one. We will likely be playing catch up for years to come. Those same voters want firm opposition to the current trend, not promises that growth will be managed more effectively going forward.

For my demographic, candidates win or lose votes based on direct answers. Hope that helps.

Vote Marty Fugate

Martin Whorley Just want to make sure you understand that I’m running for County Commission and not City Council.

I know what you’re trying to do here, but I’ll weigh in.

No, they were not irresponsoble.

If zoning is not being violated and there is nothing illegal about the development, by what cause should they have voted no? If they vote no to one development that mirrors another development that was recently passed, they open themselves up for litigstion.

If you have questions pertaining to Loudon County Commission or anything that I will actually be voting on rather than asking my opinion on a separate governing body, I’m glad to entertain those.

Out of curiosity, what other candidates have you asked since that was part of your question?

Feel free to give me a call, I’d love to discuss this with you or meet you for a cup of coffee. My # is 865-242-6019.

Vote Marty Fugate

Robert Cornett great question. Unfortunately, what folks don’t understand is that developers are abiding by the law and pay tens of thousands of dollars in fees before they build their first home. They can’t just buy land and build, everything must go through the Loudon County Planning commission. Developers and developments aren’t the enemy. People are moving to Tennessee because of the opportunity and tax friendly environments we’ve created.

We can’t get to the next level by staying where we are. Our infrastructure must grow with development and we must continue use common since along the way.

Vote Marty Fugate

Robert Cornett as is the case with all votes, it’s not always going to be a no, and it’s not always going to be a yes. If the current zoning calls for 2 units per acre and the builder is requesting 3, do you consider that high density? Sometimes, the request may be for 2.5 homes/acre when the zoning is 2 which would allow 1 extra home on a 2 acre plat. I will not be a “yes to all” vote as you’re posing, however, I will not be a “no to all”. These issues have to be debated and all factors considered. Unfortunately, I can’t make a policy commitment on a hypothetical questions.

I'll give Mr. Fugate some slack here, having not been in office, he really has no idea how it works pertaining to development. The question of whether individual developers can build more than two homes per acre doesn't come to the commission or city council on a case by case basis. The county commission and city councils are legislative bodies. We pass and adopt policies.

In the case of zoning, the Loudon County commission has adopted two homes per acre as the max density anywhere in the county outside the city limits. Lenoir City council has adopted a maximum density of 24 units per acre. These are legislative actions by the elected bodies. Planning commissions are simply recommending bodies to their respective legislative bodies. The fact that Lenoir City has adopted 24 units per acre as their maximum density is the epitome of irresponsibility. The city council could reduce their density at any council meeting if mayor Aikens would let them.

Loudon County commission has worked hard the last few years, at the request of county residents, to straighten our zoning policies to protect county residents from ruthless developers who have but one desire, to make money at any cost.

The better question for Mr. Fugate would be, if elected, would he support changing the county zoning policies to allow for higher density development in the county? I think we've already heard his answer.

Let me assure Mr. Fugate, the vast majority of 5th district and county residents, don't want to "get to the next level" when it comes to development.

BACK
2/12/24