Chancellor Frank V. Williams III handed down a judgment
Friday in hopes of bringing the case between Loudon
County Mayor Rollen “Buddy” Bradshaw and General
Sessions Court and Circuit Court Clerk Lisa Niles to a
close.
Loudon-based attorney Joe Ford, representing Bradshaw, said the legal document will have a 30-day window before it can be closed. If neither side files a motion, Ford said the case will effectively be over.
“The next step is to file the motion to alter or
amend the judgment,” Ford said. “Both sides have
issues that are going to be brought up. But if 30
days from the date of entry, which was March 18,
goes by, then the judgment becomes final. So if we
get to April 18 and no motion to alter or amend has
been set then the judgment is final.
“But I anticipate there will be motions filed, which
will delay the finality of the judgment,” Ford said.
Both sides met with Williams in January at Morgan
County Courthouse, where he asked for legal
documentation showing Niles’ request for pay
increases for all current employees under her
supervision. Niles’ attorney, Knoxville-based
Zachary Tenry, filed a motion Jan. 11 for a
post-trial conference seeking clarification on
Williams’ memorandum opinion. Niles sought
clarification on whether she would be able to give a
total of $57,000 in raises to current employees.
In Williams’ memorandum opinion issued in December,
he ruled in favor of Niles’ attempts to gain
additional deputy clerks and more funding for
existing future employees. The four new employees
included a deputy clerk-bookkeeper at a salary of
$32,000 per year and three deputy clerks at $25,500
per year.
Retroactive pay covered the county’s 2 percent raise
during the two previous fiscal years.
According to Williams’ memorandum opinion, Niles had
the option to start new employees out at a lower pay
and make “graduated increases” in their salaries
based on performance and ability.
“The issue that was being brought up by Zach Tenry
on behalf of Ms. Niles that he commented about would
be the subject of a motion to alter or amend the
judgment,” Ford said. “Essentially what he filed
before we got the judgment in and the chancellor
said, ‘I’m not going to hear this before the
judgment goes down.’ So essentially we’re going to
go right back and argue over the same thing is my
best guess, but like I said, 30 days goes by and
nobody does anything it’s over.
“If anybody files a motion to alter or amend, then
that what they call (stalls) the 30-day period for
filing an appeal and it would not run until that
motion could be heard,” he added.
Niles declined comment, and Tenry could not be
reached before News-Herald presstime.
County Budget Director Tracy Blair said Tuesday that
Loudon County had spent $38,730 in the current
fiscal year on legal fees. Last fiscal year the
county spent $17,744.
In an interview Friday, Bradshaw said the case was
likely still “four to six weeks out.”
“I hate to speculate, but I think that’s probably a
safe assumption that they’re going to ask for —
getting some clarification or even go into the
appeal,” he said. “... Getting (this case) behind us
is the No. 1 priority. I think ideally if I had my
way come April 18 we’d be able to do whatever budget
amendments we need to do and get it behind us and
keep moving forward. So, my perspective and the
county’s perspective I think that would be a goal.
Whether or not that happens just remains to be
seen.”