FBI firing range a possibility
Commissioner Kelly Littleton-Brewster motioned and
Art Stewart seconded, with the only opposing vote from Dennis
Stewart.
“They’ve not promised us anything, they just want to
look at the land,” Yokley said. “Like I told them last night, they
could look at it and decide it’s not worthy and then we’re back at
square one, but I think it would be in the best interest of the
county and all agencies if we at least attempted to do this. I mean
if we can partner up with them then that’s just a win-win for the
county. “... It would be a county-wide training facility,” he added.
“Obviously, the range and stuff would be for law enforcement ... but
our goal in what we started out actually we saw a need for it and we
started looking at this was just an opportunity that I was told
about and I reached out to the FBI and asked them about it.”
Blount and Knox counties have already been removed as
a possible sites, Yokley said, noting the location considered would
be suitable next to Interstate 75. How much land is needed is still
unknown, but Yokley said the FBI is looking to make a decision on a
site within 3-4 weeks.
The FBI is requesting a 30-year memorandum of
understanding so it can use the facility for its own training,
Yokely said.
The site could have classroom training and three
20-lane ranges with turning targets for use only by the FBI and
local law enforcement and would not be open 24 hours per day, Guider
said.
“If they decide to go with us, everybody’s going to
have to sit down so that we’re all on the same page,” Yokley said.
“We don’t want any surprises going to anybody, and, like I said,
what they’re asking for we may not be able to do. Right now it’s
just in the beginning stages of it. They’re looking to see if it’s
going to be suitable for what they want or what they would like to
do, and like I told (the solid waste disposal commission) last
night, they may just tell us, ‘Thanks but no thanks. It’s not what
we want’.”
The property considered is a potential spot for soil
use by landfill operator Santek Waste Services, Steve Field, solid
waste board chairman, said.
“Santek is going to need soil in the future and
potentially that’s where the soil’s going to coming from, but we
need to negotiate with Santek about what the specifics are about
what they need exactly and where exactly is it going to come from
and how are they going to leave that area when they get through
borrowing the soil,” Field said. “Those are all subject to future
negotiations.
“... If there’s a property that we have that’s excess
to our needs for solid waste, if there’s other uses that the
stakeholders could use it for I’m not opposed to it, but I think if
we do something like this the stakeholders need to be intimately
involved in the decision-making process,” he added.
Stewart was opposed because he worried it could hurt
future growth.
“My reasoning was the Tennessee National, the
people who live in that community and the Matlock Bend
community, and to me that’s our prime tax revenue, potential tax
revenue property,” Stewart said. “Because of the noise factor
and those are my citizens. I just don’t think a firing (range)
with that kind of noise is something I want to subject them to,
and so not sure about the liability. ... They’d have to really
show me that there wasn’t going to be any noise or liability and
at this time I don’t think they can do that.”
One of those residents is Loudon City Manager Ty
Ross, who was at the solid waste board meeting.
“We talk about the noise and I hear law
enforcement professionals say it’s not that bad,” Ross said at
the meeting. “Well, I like to go to Monterey Mushroom and talk
about the smell and they tell me it’s not that bad. ...
Tennessee National is here now. Lighthouse Pointe is here now.
More development will come. The future of the tax base, not just
the city of Loudon, but the future tax base of Loudon County in
general is on Matlock Bend.
“If you build out Tennessee National as platted
that’s an additional $2 million of tax revenue a year, most of
which would go to the county,” he added. “I’m all about law
enforcement, but the salaries, the benefit, the equipment of law
enforcement has to come from the tax dollars and if we put in a
training facility that might hinder our ability to collect tax
dollars in the future, that’s something we have to duly
consider.”
A firing range funded by the FBI could help keep
training inside the county since LCSO now travels to Blount
County. The county previously utilized a Tennessee Valley
Authority range before it closed in 2007, Yokley said, leading
officials to consider building a training facility for local
emergency agencies that never happened because the cost was too
great.
“Like I said, it could be if something happened
here and we have to leave to come back to the county, it’s 25-30
minutes away,” Yokley said. “Is that going to change the outcome
of a certain event? It may or may not, we don’t know, but it
would be a lot easier for us to respond from somewhere inside
the county than it is to leave the county and go outside our
jurisdiction.”
FBI Public Information Officer Jason Pack said
the FBI is in “very preliminary discussions about partnering
with a local law enforcement agency.”
“Historically, we have been able to work with
other departments near our resident agencies throughout our area
on similar, mutually beneficial firing-range projects,” Pack
said in an email correspondence. “We value our relationships
with all East Tennessee law enforcement agencies, including
those in Loudon County and look forward to close cooperation in
the future.”
|
BACK
7/30/18