County wins Cook Bros. lawsuit
Kayli Martin news-herald.net
Loudon
County came out the winner in a lawsuit brought by Cook
Bros. Construction.
“It was a complete victory for the county,” County Attorney Robert “Bob” Bowman said Friday.
The complaint was filed in October 2021 after Loudon County
Commission voted 5-5 in a Sept. 7, 2021, meeting to deny the
rezoning of property off U.S Highway 321 after an initial
6-4 vote. The property was slated to become a subdivision
for a Planned Unit Development by Cook Bros.
The commission action
later fueled a decision to basically ban PUDs in the county
and was central in the 2022 election campaigns of numerous
people seeking a seat on commission.
Plaintiffs in the
suit filed for summary judgment in June 2022.
“The undisputed facts prove that Loudon County Commission’s decision to deny the plaintiffs’ rezoning request was illegal, arbitrary and capricious,” according to the motion.
Bowman said
Chancellor Tom McFarland essentially dismissed the
lawsuit.
McFarland found the actions by Loudon County Commission nearly 18 months ago were a legislative function and there was no reason under the rational basis standard to overturn what commission did, Bowman said.
Commissioner Van
Shaver told the commission at the start of a Feb. 21
workshop about the ruling in Roane County earlier that
day. Shaver said both attorneys were allowed to make
arguments.
Shaver said
McFarland ruled that commission acted within their
authority and said he would not overturn the decision of
an elected body.
“So that lawsuit
has been settled now,” Shaver said. “They certainly
would have the right to appeal if they choose to. Based
on the way the chancellor ruled today, an appeal would
likely not be successful ... so that one (is) behind us.
I guess bring on the next one.”
Bowman said he has
not received any indication from opposing counsel of an
intent to file an appeal.
After multiple
attempts, Knoxville attorney Ellis “Sandy” Sharp, who
represented John Cook, owner of Cook Bros., could not be
reached for comment.
Court documents
related to the judgment were unavailable by News-Herald
presstime.
|
BACK
3/13/23