County OKs court agreement with Lenoir City
Jeremy Nash news-herald.net
Loudon County Commission and Lenoir City Council reached an agreement that will allow criminal court proceedings at the city’s municipal building on U.S. Highway 321. The memorandum of understanding was unanimously approved by council during its Jan. 13 meeting and Jan. 21 by the county.
An
email 9th Judicial District Attorney General Russell Johnson
sent to the attorney general’s office in Nashville outlined that
Lenoir City’s courtroom was larger and more secure than the
modified former city council meeting room in Loudon. The
temporary location in Loudon is being used after fire destroyed
Loudon County Courthouse in April.
Johnson said Senior Assistant
Attorney General Nick Spangler and Chief Deputy Assistant
Attorney General Zach Hinkle gave the “proverbial green
light” to have criminal court jury trials in Lenoir City.
“It boils down to security is
the bottom line on it,” Rollen “Buddy” Bradshaw, county
mayor, said. “We’ve got several murder cases coming up and
so security — with these murder cases that are coming up, we
want to just guarantee safety for everybody involved — the
jurors, the prosecution, the defense and the people that are
on trial. From a safety and security standpoint that was
just the best option.
“We’re certainly grateful for
Loudon for what they’ve done, but we also want to thank
Lenoir City for stepping up when we needed them to find a
better place to hold our hearings,” he added.
Johnson pointed to Tennessee
Code Annotated 5-7-105(b), which says a county can hold
criminal court, including indictment, prosecution and
conviction of criminal defendants, within the county but
outside the county seat.
“In researching the matter,
it appears that TCA 5-7-105(b) provides some guidance in
that it was enacted in 2006 after the repeal of TCA 16-2-106
through 16-2-104 in part (which might affect the fact that
the Loudon County Justice Center was built outside the
county seat in 1974),” Johnson wrote in the email. “... This
same subsection would appear to allow us to hold criminal
court in a building not located within the county seat where
the county is using said building (presumably as a ‘criminal
justice building or facility).’ The Lenoir City City Hall is
not a building or a facility constructed as a ‘criminal
justice building or facility’ nor is it a building or a
facility that the county is using as a ‘criminal justice
building or facility.’
“Instead, it is a
building purchased from SunTrust Bank by the city of
Lenoir City, remodeled as a city hall by the city of
Lenoir City and now used by the city of Lenoir City —
not Loudon County,” he added.
Johnson said TCA 5-7-105,
attorney general opinions 03-060 and 05-155 and the
rules and criminal procedures on change of venue have
been reviewed.
“Our concern is that most
defendants, especially in a murder trial, are not going
to voluntarily and affirmatively waive their right to be
tried in a courtroom located in the county seat if
refusing to wave may provide them some procedural or
tactical advantage in their trial or on appeal,” Johnson
said.
Van Shaver, county
commissioner, agreed the move was for safety.
“More space even because
they’ve got to impound jurors, so they just need more
space and more security,” Shaver said. “Certainly,
Lenoir City’s facility is better suited for that than
our temporary location in Loudon.”
Shaver has pushed for the
county to construct new courtroom space on the justice
center property, which is outside the county seat.
“That’s been the argument
thus far to oppose the justice center is, ‘Well, it’s
outside the county seat,’ and the city of Loudon would
never, ever annex it according to — I mean we’ve never
heard that from the city councilmen in Loudon, but we’ve
heard that from members of our body,” Shaver said. “Now
that that hurdle has pretty much been shot down we can
hold criminal court outside the county seat. That
certainly makes the justice center location far more
possible than what we would have thought previously.”
Bradshaw remains
adamant court proceedings will remain in Loudon.
“Just for the simple
fact that we got permission, we went through the
proper channels here,” he said. “The bottom line is
the court proceedings under normal circumstances are
being held in the county seat. I think it’s only
temporary. I don’t think it’ll spread anything other
than (the temporary time).”
He could not
determine how long court proceedings would take
place in Lenoir City.
“I imagine at least
until we can get up and going in the old
courthouse,” Bradshaw said. “We certainly don’t want
to be a burden on our insurance. Our insurance is
not going to pay much past when we do get the old
courthouse up and going. So I think once we get it
going we can resume business as usual even as we
continue to explore the option of another annex.”
Lenoir City Mayor
Tony Aikens said the city was willing to help in any
way.
“The criminal court
judge (Jeff Wicks) contacted me months ago,” Aikens
said. “He was just wanting to make sure that he was
within the law to do that and we’re happy to help
them out and to let them use the courtroom whenever
possible or whenever they need it.”
|
BACK
2/3/20