Commission considers
electronic voting Jeremy Nash news-herald.net
Loudon
County Commission will soon consider adding an electronic
voting system that some officials hope could make meetings
more efficient.
Loudon
County Mayor Rollen “Buddy” Bradshaw has wanted the
legislative meeting program since attending a Tennessee
County Services Association fall conference three years ago.
On
Monday, Bradshaw introduced OpenMeeting Technologies
representatives Mark Netsch and Mike Bauer, who through Zoom
showcased what the program had to offer. Commissioners went
through a practice run of how they could use the system for
a meeting.
“I think it streamlines everything, it keeps everything a little bit organized, a little bit pointed in the right direction, and I think it’d be a valid step,” Bradshaw said.
Fees, licensing
and 12 tablets for commissioners, Bradshaw and Loudon
County Budget Director Tracy Blair could cost $12,000,
Bradshaw said. There is also an annual fee, which
according to the OpenMeeting Technologies presentation,
is $3,500. Additional costs are incurred if other
committees use the system.
Blair said money
could come out of Fund 171 for capital projects.
“Looking forward the way it goes, I think it takes some of the standing out of it,” Bradshaw said. “I think it takes away your bandwagon vote. We discuss these items at extent at our workshop, such as tonight, and then we come back and we rehash it all again.
“Our meetings can
sometimes be long, which I don’t object, that’s kind of
what we get paid to do, but I’ve seen counties go
through 100-item agendas in 30 minutes,” he added. “I
think it’s just an opportunity to make the way we
operate a little bit smoother.”
Commissioner Matthew Tinker favored the program’s potential.
“I think if you
watch some of those meetings and the way that they take
place, it’s a huge difference,” Tinker said. “It’s way
more organized, much more professional, much less
arguing and bickering back and forth in those meetings
that should have taken place during the workshop. I mean
those meetings are meant to be voting meetings, not
two-hour-long discussion meetings. That’s what tonight
is for.”
Commissioner Van
Shaver disagreed, adding that he doesn’t believe
electronic voting will change how meetings are operated.
The speaker
option, which lists those seeking to talk, is also
worthwhile, Tinker said.
“That way
people aren’t talking over each other or arguing
back and forth,” he said. “That’s not how a meeting
is supposed to run either. That’s why those are set
up that way. I like the order of it. Now that’s just
the way that I like things to run.”
Although
Commissioner Gary Whitfield is “on the fence”
regarding the system, he sees some benefits.
“I do think
the pros of folks (not) talking over each other,
hopefully speeding up the meeting,” Whitfield said.
“I do agree with Commissioner Tinker that during a
workshop all our discussions ought to be done during
a workshop and when it comes to meeting time, it’s
meeting time. I hope that may change some of that
but I’m not sure that it would.
|
BACK
10/25/21