Bridge won't be saved
The community’s attempt to save the J. Carmichael
Greer Bridge atop Fort Loudoun Dam has failed, but now local
officials have shifted gears in hopes of utilizing land around the
new bridge for public recreational use.
“What we’re looking to do is to take the properties
that now are not being utilized at all and convert those into a
walking trail, bike trail, recreation area,” state Rep. Jimmy
Matlock, R-Lenoir City, said. “We have a plan that we proposed to
(Tennessee Valley Authority), but I’ve not been authorized to talk
about that yet. ... There’s some exciting alternatives, but Jimmy’s
not happy about (losing the Save the Bridge project) at all. The
bridge project was the best option.
“It is what we worked for, it was we had hoped for,
it’s what we planned for, raised money, had multiple meetings for,”
he added. “I sound like a crybaby, but it’s still disappointing to
think about it.”
A last-ditch effort was considered earlier this year
for the Save the Bridge project, which Matlock said if achieved
would have been “one for the ages.” He said officials considered
amending the federal budget in Washington, D.C., which was called
the “nuclear option.” The amendment was not made for fear it might
“sour relationships with TVA and ultimately cost more goodwill to
the community and the region than we would win.”
Demolition of the old bridge is projected to take
place July 7-Oct. 26 per the contractor’s current schedule,
Tennessee Department of Transportation spokesman Mark Nagi said.
TVA expressed interest in using land around the new
bridge for public recreational use. Ideas were discussed at a recent
Lenoir City Committee of 100 meeting.
“I really think there’s going to be some things come
out of the bridge,” Matlock said. “What appears to be maybe a really
disappointing decision from TVA has led to them to be open to some
ideas that really came from Clayton (Pangle) of some plans that I’m
excited about.”
There are 1,400 acres of TVA property associated with
the Tellico and Fort Loudoun dam reservations, TVA spokesman Jim
Hopson said. Some property is already in use, such as Lenoir City
Park.
“We have not picked out any particular spots, but
there are three kind of tracks of land that are currently not being
used for traditional recreation purposes that would be near the
abutment, the Lenoir City side of the abutment to the bridge. Those
would be the most logical places if we’re trying to figure out a way
to connect say the existing Lenoir City Park over to the new bridge
location,” Hopson said. “There is nothing firm at this point. That’s
the reason why we simply had a discussion with the Committee of 100,
broached some of the ideas but we’re not going to put anything on or
take anything off the table at this point.”
Hopes are to use the new bridge as a connector
between the three tracts, but Lenoir City Committee of 100
member Clayton Pangle said any considerations will have to be
made after the bridge is completed.
“The idea would be to still create a
park-like setting with a linear pedestrian access way being
able to be used to connect all three areas, tie into your
existing plan trail networks,” Pangle said.
Parties involved will need to agree upon a
memorandum of understanding, Pangle said, noting it includes
Lenoir City, TVA, Committee of 100 and Tellico Reservoir
Development Agency. The memorandum doesn’t commit the
parties, but serves as an agreement to move forward with
discussions.
“It’s going to be some neat stuff that will
be a multi-year project,” Matlock said. “It won’t happen in
one or two years. ... It’s going to be a multi-,
quasi-government partnership, but TVA’s basically given it
their blessing and some resources. We think it’s going to be
a reality.”
If all parties agree on the drafted
memorandum, Hopson said public comment will be considered on
land use of three areas in the “immediate vicinity” of the
new U.S. Highway 321 bridge for commercial recreation and/or
public recreation purposes. Concept drawings will then be
shared for public comment. Estimations are the planning
process will take at least a year, he said.
“The idea is to move forward, but you’d have
a bunch of steps from all parties getting the thing, getting
the memorandum of understanding just off the ground, and
then after it’s signed off on then you’d start with your
public input process and then you would reach out and work
toward a total concept picture,” Pangle said. “I think the
commonality of these land areas is that they’re owned by
TVA, but as this unfolds it might be through easements or
other things that are worked on going forward with TVA and
with the city and with TRDA.
“But if you look at all the area — you drew a
circle on everything that would be worked on in all three
land areas, then I think one of the ways to view it is a
park-like setting connected together by pedestrian access
way,” he added.
|
BACK
4/24/17