After delaying passage of an ordinance on regulating
“vicious or potentially dangerous animals” last month in
order to add provisions on cruelty to animals and a
limitation on the number of animals allowed per acre,
Lenoir City Council unanimously passed the second and
final reading by a 5-0 vote.
In response to questions from the public about the ordinance, Lenoir City Police Chief and Public Safety Director Don White said animal control has been a long-standing safety concern in the city.
“If there is an irresponsible pet owner, we’ve been
trying to deal with that for years,” White said.
“This just gives us a better tool.”
Under the ordinance, a Lenoir City judge may rule
that an animal can be confined and killed if it is
deemed vicious by attacking a human or a domestic
animal or posing an “immediate threat” to the public
and the owner has not complied with local animal
control regulations related to keeping vicious
animals.
The ordinance also stipulates that owners may not
keep more than three vicious animals on one acre,
and officers enforcing the regulation must act
within cruelty to animal provisions in state law.
Also as part of the regulation, pet owners must keep
vicious animals restrained on a leash or chain and
under the physical control of a “responsible adult”
and display signage on their property about the
animal.
Resident Leslie Caldwell said in addition to vicious
animals, dogs running loose and owners who had
multiple dogs chained up outside were also problems
in the city.
“If all those 12 dogs are not being vicious, you’re
still going to have that problem with 12 dogs
chained up outside,” Caldwell said.
Lenoir City Attorney Jim Scott said the regulation
was not drafted specifically with dogs in mind, but
written to apply to any animal that might be deemed
dangerous.
“This ordinance, at least the attempt by me in
drafting it, is to protect other animals as well as
the general public from all vicious animals, and
that’s why the physical nature of the animal is
taken into consideration by the contents of this
document,” Scott said. “... What we’re trying to do
believe it or not is trying to make sure we protect
animals as well as we protect the general public.”
Resident Carla Welch told council that responsible
pet owners often get a bad reputation because of
irresponsible residents.
“Let’s tag those owners,” Welch said. “Let’s find
those owners after two or three times, let’s put
those owners in jail. Let’s get some revenue for the
city.”
She asked whether the per acre limitation was
restricted to “vicious dogs” or to animals in
general.
“It’s not three dogs or vicious dogs on one acre,
it’s three vicious animals,” Scott said. “Three dogs
on one acre that are safe and constrained and in
compliance with the law, that’s perfectly
acceptable.”
Becki Hopson of Lenoir City asked officials how
police will be trained in enforcing the regulation.
“Because we ourselves are actually picking up the
perception that it is dog related, will others,
including police officers who try to enforce it,
also pick up that same perception?” Hopson asked.
“So what type of training will be done to ensure
that that does not happen?”
White said police will be trained on specific
provisions in the ordinance, noting the city has
addressed animal control problems for years.
“We’re not just starting something brand new,” he
said.
Lenoir City resident Connie Sledzinski said she has
seen 11 pit bulls on one city lot, noting that
numerous animals in the same place could also pose
safety risks.
“I think we need something,” Sledzinski said. “This
doesn’t keep anybody from owning any animal. It
restricts them maybe to the number, but I’ve seen
what a number of dogs can do to each other. I’m sure
a number of rattlesnakes, goats, whatever ... could
do something as well.”
After hearing from numerous members of the public,
Councilman Mike Henline made a motion to vote on and
approve the ordinance as written, which was seconded
by Councilman Bobby Johnson Sr.
“I feel like everybody had some problems with parts
of it, but generally was in agreement with it,”
Henline said.
Mayor Tony Aikens agreed. “I didn’t hear anybody say
they were against the whole thing,” Aikens said.
“There were some parts of it (people) were against.
I don’t think we’re going to make 100 percent of the
people happy. Somebody’s going to always have a
problem with it. ... There’s some good and maybe
some questionable, but I don’t know that we can get
any better than what we’ve got.”
In other business, council:
- Approved an ordinance to designate a handicapped parking space in front of a residence at 410 West 5th Ave.
- Approved the purchasing committee’s recommendation to hire the low bidder, Townsend-based Richardson Commercial & Residential Roofing, to repair the roof at the War Memorial Building. The low bid was $12,950.
- Approved a road closure in the Town Creek area for the first Angie Selvidge Memorial 5K, which is set to take place in May.