It was brought to my attention that
last week's story about the 23 million in reserves has caused a
little
consternation among some. I even heard that some say I was only telling "one
side of the story." The numbers I reported came straight from the
State Comptroller's audit report. I didn't make up the numbers. So
I'm not sure how I left out any part of the story. So, let's establish the
facts.
County revenues have continued to
steadily grow despite the weak economy. Below are some tables
showing property tax and sales tax revenues for the last four fiscal
years. Again, these numbers are straight from the Comptroller's
audits.
Property Tax Revenues |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
County General |
$7,740,722.00 |
$7,576,147.00 |
$9,181,179.00 |
$8,190,202.00 |
Education |
$7,546,543.00 |
$7,889,722.00 |
$7,990,529.00 |
$9,360,026.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$15,287,265.00 |
$15,465,869.00 |
$17,171,708.00 |
$17,550,228.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property Tax |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
To All Departments |
$17,201,447.00 |
$18,439,628.00 |
$20,418,018.00 |
$21,535,247.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
County General |
$687,038.00 |
$723,011.00 |
$744,047.00 |
$750,978.00 |
Education |
$2,878,213.00 |
$2,947,815.00 |
$2,983,774.00 |
$2,876,695.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$3,565,251.00 |
$3,670,826.00 |
$3,727,821.00 |
$3,627,673.00 |
You might notice that the only
negative in the tables above was about a hundred thousand dollar
decrease in sales tax revenues in 2009. That's a little less than a
3% decrease from the previous year and given the state of the
economy, that's far better than most of the state.
According to the comptroller,
property tax revenues continue to grow with only a slight decrease
in sales tax. According to the comptroller, at the end of the 2009
fiscal year, the county had over $23,000,000.00 in combined
reserves. According to the comptroller, the county general fund had
$8,388,628.00 in reserves. Let's stop here. Let's take the worst
case scenario and say that the county revenues never increase again
and the county general fund looses $500,000.00 per year. At that
rate, it would take 16.7 years for the county general fund to go
broke. Of course this is not even realistic. Property tax revenues
increase every year.
The real problem here is not a lack
of revenues but a lack of spending control. Government should have
to live within it's means just like the citizens who pay the taxes
have to. It's so simple. If your revenues do go down, you spend
less.
The driver behind this discussion is
the school building program. I certainly don't consider myself a
financial wizard or a mathematical genius but like you, I can add and subtract
and do multiplication. One more time, I'm going to publish the
facts of the building program. Please don't take my word for it, do
the math yourself. See if the numbers work out. And to those who
would say I'm wrong or I only tell one side of the story, don't just say
I'm wrong, prove me wrong.
The current adopted building plan consists
of four projects. A new K-12 school at Greenback, A new 6-8
middle school in Loudon, combining the two existing Loudon
schools as a K-5 and expanding the cafeteria at
Philadelphia. Total estimated cost for all four projects
including all alternates, $41,359,096.00. Alternates are
options that would be nice but not necessary to the project.
Total estimated cost for all four projects with no
alternates, $40,671,196.00.
New Greenback School-184,268 sq. ft.,
$25,058,878.00 W/O, Alternates $24,668,878.00.
New Loudon Middle School-92,391 sq. ft., $12,424,218.00, W/O
Alternates $12,126,318.00.
Combine Loudon Elementary & Middle. $2,500,000.00
Philadelphia Cafeteria Expansion- $1,376,000.00
Now the deductions. Commission and the
school board agree the Philadelphia Cafeteria Expansion can
and should be paid from Rural Debt Fund reserves. Deduct
$1,376,000.00 from the amount needed to be borrowed. The
school board has also decided to defer any further action on
combining the two Loudon schools. The combining of the
Loudon Elementary and Middle Schools couldn't even take
place till the new middle school was completed. Deduct
$2,500,000.00 from the amount needed to be borrowed. Total
needed to borrow for the two new schools with all
alternates, $37,483,126.00
For the sake of this article, let's use
the highest figure of $37,483,126.00. Now we all know that
this figure could be higher or lower depending on the
construction and materials costs when we ever actually go to
build.
Now the money. I'm going to try to boil
this down as simple as possible but it is a little
complicated. The building program will be financed through
fund 156, The Rural Debt Fund. The county would borrow the
money and the payment on the debt would come from this fund.
The information below is what Commissioner Austin Shaver has
presented to the commission. I've checked, rechecked and
doubled checked his facts and figures just to be sure
they're right.
Currently, there are 21.21 pennies
designated to the Rural Debt Fund. These are property tax
pennies that were designated by commission for the building
program and other debts. Using to most conservative figures
possible, each of these pennies is worth $145,548.00. That
means that there is $3,087,073.00 going into the Rural Debt
Fund annually.
As of February, the Rural Debt Fund had a
fund balance of 6.4 million dollars. There are currently
several existing debts in Fund 156:
-$3 million loan – Payoff is approximately
$1.4 million;
-$1.9 million for various school projects (designs, roofs,
etc…) -Payoff of the $900,000 requires approximately
$700,000; -The remaining debts for new school construction,
drawings, designs etc. will be rolled into the
total school building program funding per the commission’s
statement at the time the money was allocated;
-$12.5 million that will require 6.87 pennies to maintain
payments for final payoff in 2025.
The plan would be to pay off $3 million
loan and the $900,000 with current Rural Debt Fund reserves
still leaving more than 4 million in fund balance. This
would leave just the $12.5 million loan which will require
about one million per year thru 2025 to pay off. Doing the
math on all these numbers leave us with $2,087,000.00 per
year that can be used to make a loan payment. Now remember,
I'm using the most conservative revenue numbers I can to make the
point. The true revenues would be somewhat higher. Just
being cautious.
How much can the county borrow and payback
with $2,087,000.00 per year? It all depends on the interest
rate at the time we borrow the money. Here's how it breaks
down.
$41 million for 30 years @ 3% =
$2,074,291.80/year
$38.5 million for 30 years @ 3.5% = $2,074,586.40/year
$36.4 million for 30 years @ 4% = $2,085,350.04/year
$32.4 million for 30 years @ 5% = $2,087,162.52/year
As you can see, the final interest rate we
get will make a big difference in the amount of money we can
borrow but we will not know that till commission is ready to
borrow the money. Some have argued that a 30 year loan would
cost too much in interest over the life of the loan. But
just because the loan is for 30 years doesn't prevent
earlier payoff. Certainly a 20 year loan would cost less but
so too would a 10 year loan or for that matter not borrowing
at all would be the cheapest way out. But whether it's your
home loan or a school loan, you borrow what you can afford
to pay back.
Bottom line, the amount we need to borrow
for the current proposed building
program is $37,483,126.00.
With the funds available now, we can afford to borrow
somewhere between $32.4 million to $41 million depending on
interest rate. That means the school board might have to
reduce the size/scope of the building plan a little. Both
new schools have areas where reductions could be made if
necessary. We can make
the plan fit the money if commission would just give us a
number.
We're there. The plan is ready, the money's there and to be
perfectly honest, there's even more revenue already
available now. It would just take too long to break it down
in this story but it's there. |
The information above is not "my
opinion" but simple facts. Please, don't just take my figures as
fact. Do the math yourself and see if the figures work. |