LENOIR CITY — Krystal Myers is an honors student,
captain of the swim team and editor of her high school newspaper.
She's also an atheist in a predominantly Christian
student body.
In a recent editorial that Myers, 18, intended for
the Lenoir City High School newspaper entitled "No Rights: The Life
of an Atheist," she questioned her treatment by the majority.
"Why does atheism have such a bad reputation? Why
do we not have the same rights as Christians?" she wrote.
Myers' editorial also accused school
administrators, teachers and coaches of violating the constitution
by promoting "pro-Christian" beliefs during school-sponsored events.
Lenoir City school authorities have denied Myers
permission to publish her editorial in the Panther Press, the staff
supervised student newspaper.
They also say their policies do not violate the
constitutional rights of any students.
Schools Director Wayne Miller said it was the
decision of the school authorities not to allow publication of
Myers' editorial because of the potential for disruption in the
school.
"We do have the right to control the content of
the school paper if we feel it is in the best interest of the
students," he said.
School administrators do have the right to control
information distributed to students if publication would cause a
disruption in the school, confirmed Dr. Charles Haynes, senior
scholar at the First Amendment Center in Washington D.C.
Legal limits
Information that might not be appropriate for
general distribution to students, including that of a religious or
sexual nature, can still be discussed in Lenoir City High School
under the proper circumstances, Miller said.
The high school offers a program called P3 or
"positive, peer pressure" where students are able to voice opinions
on a wide range of subjects including religion, he said. There are
also "hot-lines" that students can use to reach out during any type
of personal crisis, including bullying, he said.
Even more important, Miller said, is an attitude
of tolerance to all religions and other minorities within the school
system.
"I have addressed the teachers about this subject.
We try to be really tolerant," he said.
As to the constitutional violations alleged by
Myers, Miller said he is comfortable the school system is on the
right side of the law. Prayers at athletic events are student-led.
School board meetings do begin with a prayer, but there are usually
no students present, he said.
According to a 1999 6th Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals ruling, Cleveland School Board vs. Coles, school boards are
not allowed to conduct prayer services during board meetings, Haynes
said.
Myers gives other examples in Lenoir City of what
she believes are constitutional violations, including T-shirts worn
by a teacher that depict the crucifix and a "Quote of the day" that
teachers write on the boards in the classroom.
The quotes often include Bible verses, she said.
She said she wasn't worried about the reaction of
other students to her editorial. "I think the teachers would be more
upset," she said.
Myers also cited Lee vs. Wiseman, a U.S. Supreme
Court decision based on a case where a parent tried to stop a rabbi
from speaking at a middle school graduation. The court ruled in a
5-4 decision that the inclusion of clergy who offer prayers at
official public school ceremonies violates the Establishment Clause
of the First Amendment.
"The school's rule creates subtle and indirect
coercion (students must stand respectfully and silently), forcing
students to act in ways which establish a state religion," the
ruling said.
Prayers that are not listed on the event agenda
but which are part of the spontaneous expression of a speaker are
allowed.
Prayers at graduations that are listed on the
program are not spontaneous events protected by free speech, Myers
argues. Prayer before athletic events is also unconstitutional
because it is encouraged by teachers and coaches, she said.
"As the captain of the swim team, I feel I have to
be a part of it," she said.
Minority vs. majority
The American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee
addressed the issue of religion in schools with the release in
September 2011 of a publication entitled "Know Your Rights: Religion
in Public Schools – A Guide for Administrators and Teachers" to
public school superintendents across the state.
The brochure outlines which religious activities
in public schools are and are not permissible based on federal court
decisions and the guarantees of the Establishment, Free Exercise and
Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment.
Educators often struggle to understand how these
requirements interrelate and how they apply to specific
circumstances, said Hedy Weinberg, ACLU-TN executive director in
Nashville.
"This is especially true when the majority of
students and community members belong to the same faith tradition,"
she said.
According to the guidelines, school administrators
cannot make decisions regarding free speech based on the best
interests of the majority.
"While school systems often conclude that the
school's treatment of religion should favor the majority's interest,
the Bill of Rights protects minority rights as they relate to
religious activities in public schools," Weinberg said.
Recently, a Rhode Island high school student
successfully sued her school district over a religious mural that
had been displayed for almost 50 years. The matter went before U.S.
District Judge Ronald Lagueux, who ruled Jan. 12 that "no amount of
debate can make the school prayer anything other than a prayer."
Myers said she plans to study journalism in
college next year. She is the daughter of Marty and Jennifer Myers
of Lenoir City. Her parents did not want to be quoted in this story.
No Rights: The Life of an Atheist
By Krystal Myers
The point of view expressed in this article does not
necessarily reflect the point of view of the Panther Press, its
staff, adviser, or school.
As a current student in Government, I have realized
that I feel that my rights as an Atheist are severely limited and
unjust when compared to other students who are Christians. Not only
are there multiple clubs featuring the Christian faith, but youth
ministers are also allowed to come onto school campus and hand candy
and other food out to Christians and their friends. However, I feel
like if an Atheist did that, people would not be happy about it.
This may not be true, but due to pervasive negative feelings towards
Atheists in the school, I feel that it would be the case. My
question is, “Why? Why does
Atheism have such a bad reputation?” And an even
better question, “Why do Christians have special rights not allowed
to non-believers?”
Before I even begin, I just want to clear up some
misconceptions about Atheism. No, we do not worship the “devil.” We
do not believe in God, so we also do not believe in Satan. And we
may be “godless” but that does not mean that we are without morals.
I know, personally, I strive to be the best person I can be, even
without religion. In fact, I have been a better person since I have
rejected religion. And perhaps the most important misconception is
that we want to convert everyone into Atheists and that we hate
Christians. For the most part, we just want to be respected for who
we are and not be judged.
Now you should know exactly what an Atheist is.
Dictionary.com says that an Atheist is, “
a
person who denies or
disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or
beings.”
However, this does not mean that Atheists do not believe in higher
causes; we just do not believe in a higher being.
With that being said, I can move on to the real
issue. Before I begin, I want you to think about your rights and how
your perceived “rights” might be affecting the rights of others.
There are several instances where my rights as a
non-believer, and the rights of anyone other than a Christian, have
been violated. These instances inspired me to investigate the laws
concerning the separation of church and state, and I learned some
interesting things. However, first, I would like you to know
specifically what my grievances are against the school. First and
foremost is the sectarian prayer that occurs at graduation every
year. Fortunately, I am not the first one to have thought that this
was a problem. In the Supreme Court case,
Lee v. Weisman,
it was decided that allowing prayer at graduation is a violation of
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment that says, “Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Special speakers can pray,
but the school cannot endorse the prayer or plan for it to happen.
Public prayer also occurs at all of the home
football games using the public address system. This has, again,
been covered by the Supreme Court case
Santa Fe Independent
School District v. Doe.
The Court ruled that school-sponsored prayer is an unconstitutional
violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. If a
speaker prays, it is fine. However, as soon as the school provides
sponsorship, it becomes illegal. Sponsorship can be almost anything,
even something as simple as saying that the speaker can pray or
choosing a speaker with a known propensity to pray or share his or
her religious views.
However, it is not just the speakers who we have to
fear at Lenoir City High School. We also have to fear some of the
teachers and what they might say about their own religious beliefs.
On at least two separate occasions, teachers have made their
religious preferences known to basically the whole school.
One teacher has made her religious preferences known
by wearing t-shirt depicting the crucifix while performing her
duties as a public employee. Also, Kristi Brackett, a senior at
Lenoir City High School, has said that the teacher, “strongly
encouraged us to join [a religious club] and be on the group’s
leadership team.” Yet again, this violates the Establishment Clause
of the First Amendment. When asked if this was true, the teacher
replied, “As a teacher I would never use my power of influence to
force my beliefs or the beliefs of [a religious club] on any student
in the school.” Regardless, the religious t-shirts are still
inappropriate in the school setting. Teachers are prohibited from
making their religious preferences known; the Constitution requires
them to be neutral when acting in their capacity as a public school
teacher.
Not only are religious preferences shown through
shirts, but also through a “Quote of the Day” that some teachers
write on the boards in their classrooms. One teacher has Bible
verses occasionally as the teacher’s “Quote of the Day” for
students. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment has been
violated, yet again with no regard for non-believers.
But perhaps I would have more hope in our school and
the possibility of change on the horizon if our own school board did
not open their meetings with prayer. A person who wished to remain
anonymous that has been present at school board meetings says, “They
do have prayers. They pray to ‘Our Heavenly Father’ and end with ‘In
Jesus’ Name We Pray.’” Not only is this a violation of Supreme Court
law, but also a violation of the board’s own policy that prohibits
prayer at school-sponsored events.
The whole foundation of how our school is conducted
is established by obvious Christians. Somehow, this is unsurprising.
If our School Board chooses to ignore the Establishment Clause of
the First Amendment and the Supreme Court
,
then it is no
surprise that teachers choose to do the same.
I know that I will keep trying to gain my rights as
an Atheist and as an American citizen, but I also need your help in
educating other people to realize the injustice done to all minority
groups. The Christian faith cannot rule the United States. It is
unconstitutional. Religion and government are supposed to be
separate. If we let this slide, what other amendments to the
Constitution will be ignored? I leave you to decide what you will or
will not do, but just remember that non-believers are not what you
originally thought we were; we are human beings just like you.