Lenoir City Council on Monday delayed approving an
ordinance dealing with vicious animals inside city
limits, saying the ordinance needs to include language
on animal abuse.
A public hearing and second and final reading of the ordinance will be heard March 9, Lenoir City Mayor Tony Aikens said later in Monday’s meeting. The city’s next council meeting set for Feb. 23 has been canceled.
Lenoir City Police Chief and Public Safety Director
Don White said between now and the final reading,
city officials will tweak the drafted ordinance to
include language dealing with chaining dogs and
maintaining a database on residents who reportedly
abuse animals.
“It gives us as law enforcement the ability to take
care of problems,” White said. “And we certainly
don’t want to see animals abused or mistreated in
any way, and we certainly don’t want viscous animals
to possibly get loose or create issues for our
residents.”
White said several residents and humane
organizations voiced concerns with the first draft.
“One of the things we wanted to look at is we did
not have a section that addressed chaining dogs with
heavy chains such as logging chains,” White said.
“So we want to visit that issue and probably add
some language that would cover that because
obviously that is not a good treatment of any
animal.”
Lenoir City Attorney Jim Scott said in a previous
interview that the new policy on deemed “vicious” or
potentially dangerous animals gives authority to
Lenoir City Judge Terry Vann and law enforcement to
swiftly take action should the animal pose an
immediate threat to public health and safety.
According to the ordinance, the Lenoir City judge
can order the impoundment and destruction of an
animal if the animal has attacked, bitten or injured
a human being or domestic animal, the animal is
vicious and the owner has failed to comply with
requirements and conditions for keeping a vicious
animal.
White said the amendments will be modeled after
other ordinances in surrounding communities.
“We will sit down and look at the ordinance and go
back through it and let them (residents and humane
organizations) tell us what their thoughts are,”
White said. “... I think overall they were pleased
with the ordinance. They weren’t disappointed in
what the city was doing because they did realize
that it is going to help us control bad
environments.”